Traffic Control Centres (TCCs) are directly or indirectly involved in most RNO operating strategies to some extent. For example TCC managers and operators can use Advanced Travel Information Systems (ATIS) to help mitigate the impact of non-recurring congestion in various ways. The objective is to deliver an as near as possible congestion-free network through the use of direct control measures and maximising the dissemination of traveller information using all available channels, particularly VMS, telephone information services (511 in USA), Highway Advisory Radio, internet web sites and social media. (See Traveller Services)
Traffic Control Centres (TCCs) are known by different names in different regions of the world. Even in Europe, where the term TCC is common, some cities also have multi-modal Travel Information Centres (TICs). Some of the core activities for a TCC are to issue traffic information, which makes the term confusing.
In North America and Australia the term Transportation (or Traffic) Management Centre (TMC) is commonly used. Some USA centres and most in South America are called Traffic Operations Centres (TOCs). In the USA, “traffic control centre” is often used for (usually local) centralised traffic signal system control centres.
To avoid confusion, this website uses TCC to cover all such centres, unless otherwise stated.
TCC managers and operators can use ITS components to manage traffic and respond to incidents and emergencies. Typically ITS functionally in TCCs includes:
The primary focus of many TCCs tends to be on supporting traffic management activities on major roadways, including incident response. While this may remain their primary function, a growing number of centres are finding ways to interact, share information and collaborate with partners in the overall management of the road system. Snowplough and ice mitigation operations are examples.
One of the key elements in planning for Road Network Operations is to ensure the successful design, implementation, operation and maintenance of the Traffic Control Centres (TCCs). This planning should be based on completed ITS studies and initiatives for the region such as a regional ITS architecture, strategic deployment plan, a “Concept of Operations” for the TCC – and operations and management plans. (See How to Create an Architecture)
The Concept of Operations for a TCC is a high-level description of system capabilities that are based on a vision, goals, identified needs and high-level requirements that are mutually agreed between the leading stakeholders. This forms the basis for defining the detailed requirements and for producing a high-level design. The Concept of Operations will also identify other major stakeholders, planned network coverage and operating hours and required resources (for example, hardware, software, facilities and personnel).
Guidance on how to develop the Concept of Operations for a TCC has been prepared by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in the USA (see below). A Concept of Operations document will form a solid basis for establishing TCC operations and maintenance procedures, acquiring and utilising resources and interfacing with TCC stakeholders. The stakeholders include other public entities, private-sector companies, the general public and the media.
A video depicting various scenarios in a futuristic TCC, the TMC of the Future, can be accessed in ITS America's Knowledge Centre under "Featured Videos" at http://itsa.org/knowledgecenter/knowledge-center-20.
The video runs for about 45 minutes. It was produced by the Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITSA) for the 2008 ITS World Congress in New York City. Using actors, various traffic and incident scenarios were “performed” to live audiences. The TCC featured the more advanced features of a modern TCC and stressed the interagency activities in response to the “incidents” occurring. This video captures one performance.
It features the future use of what in 2008 was called "Vehicle-Infrastructure Integration (VII)" – but is now referred to as "connected vehicles" in the USA and “Cooperative Vehicle Highway Systems (CVHS)” elsewhere. The CVHS programme globally is still largely in the Research and Development (R&D) stage, so its use in the TCC is largely futuristic, although one of the key elements is the use of Floating Vehicle Data for traffic flow characteristics, which is becoming commonplace (See Probe Vehicle Monitoring and Probe Data).
The video shows this TCC also operates traffic signals on the arterial network and Integrated Corridor Management - which are increasingly being implemented across the world. It also addresses integration with other transport modes and services, such as public transport and parking and congestion pricing.
A Traffic Control Centre’s functions vary according to which agency operates it. The functional “separations” between motorway and urban network control are not rigid distinctions; and, ideally, the two would merge to enable fully integrated Management and Operations. Some countries, states or regions have moved in this direction, but it can involve considerable effort and expense.
The organisational and operational responsibilities of TCCs for different types of network varies:
There are no clear technology differences between these three groups and they often overlap in function, but the institutional differences are more distinct. Advanced ITS applications provide the means for regional and local TCCs to work together, coordinate activities and share information when the need arises. (See Integrated Operations)
In many countries a growing number of local agencies have, or plan to develop, local fully functional TCCs, which are organised and operated to support the responsibilities of local agencies. On a daily basis this allows each TCC to effectively carry out its core mission.
The various services provided by a TCC can be grouped according to high-level functions, such as those shown in the diagram and described below:
Example of Traffic Control Centre Activities and Services (Source: Highways England UK)
The TCC needs decision support information on the network including a database of road network characteristics, information about incidents and other events (roadworks, accidents), traffic flow and journey times, and weather conditions.
This requires the TCC to adopt systems for:
1. the network description and location referencing (See Basic Info-structure)
2. obtaining information about:
3. continuous monitoring of:
(See Data and Information, Traffic & Status Monitoring and Weather Monitoring)
The TCC needs to develop traffic management response plans that support its control strategies and the choice of information to be provided during incidents that affect traffic on the network. When incidents occur the TCC will implement these plans and analyse and update those plans on the basis of experience.
This requires:
(See Integrated Strategies)
These are the means by which a TCC provides information to media organisations, road users and the travelling public . They may include providing VMS at key locations on the road network, providing an internet site for public information – and use of social media and an interactive telephone service.
Specifically the TCC core services will be:
(See Travel Information Systems and Traveller Services)
These are activities that enable the TCC to provide information and take action that will improve the ability of other organisations (operating partners) to perform their duties in managing the traffic and operations on their networks. The TCC needs to establish links with the traffic controllers for site that generate traffic or are major destinations. Examples might be a ferry port or airport, shipping container terminal, mineral extraction sites, major sports or entertainment centres, retail parks and shopping malls
They include:
(See Planning and Reporting, Public Transport Operations & Fleet Management and Operations & Fleet Management)
Management services relate to the day-to-day operation of the Traffic Control Centre and any additional operations that are required, specifically:
For a TCC that covers toll road operations the ITS traffic systems and the electronic tolling systems are usually completely separate. They are not permitted to integrate, at least electronically, to protect the integrity of toll revenues. Toll-road TCCs generally manage incidents in the same way as their non-tolling counterparts. The fact that they operate facilities whose users are paying in real-time increases the pressure to clear incidents quickly. In some locations, such as Santiago, Chile, various toll roads use the same transponders to identify all vehicles passing through the toll gantries.
(See Toll Collection)
Urban Traffic Control Centres (TCCs) have operated traffic signal systems for years using a wide range of software packages. Their main purpose is to keep traffic moving in the urban network of arterial roads. As more ITS devices are being deployed in the arterial networks, the use of ITS for Arterial Traffic Management Systems (ATMS) is becoming commonplace. European practice is to refer to Urban Traffic Control (UTC), or Urban Traffic Management and Control (UTMC).
A summary of operations for a TCC that controls an urban arterial road network is given in the tables below. (See also TCC Functions)
Operational Function |
Operational Method |
Resources Used |
Desired Result |
Surveillance |
Visual monitoring |
CCTV, video wall, work-stations, video “tours” |
Maximum visual coverage of network |
Sensor monitoring |
Electronic detectors |
Maximum sensor coverage of network, capture traffic characteristics |
|
Vehicle probes |
Mobile safety patrols, crowd sourcing, floating vehicles |
Detect and verify incidents in timely fashion |
|
Traffic control/ influence |
Signal operation |
Traffic signal controllers |
Regulate traffic flow through intersections, along corridors and in networks |
Traveller information |
Inform public and logistics managers of conditions for self-decisions |
Operational Function |
Operational Method |
Resources Used |
Desired Result |
Traffic control/ influence |
Signal operation |
Traffic signal controllers and traffic control software |
Regulate traffic flow particularly along corridors and through networks |
Contra-flow or other special lane use |
Lane signals, VMS |
Increase roadway capacity |
Operational Function |
Operational Method |
Resources Used |
Desired Result |
Surveillance |
Sensor monitoring |
RWMS (although rare on arteries) |
Detect adverse weather |
Visual monitoring |
CCTV, video wall, workstations, video “tours” |
Detect and verify adverse weather |
Operational Function |
Operational Method |
Resources Used |
Desired Result |
Surveillance |
Visual monitoring |
CCTV, video wall, workstations, video “tours” |
Detect and verify incident, dispatch response, notify other responders |
Incident notification |
Police, Emergency Control Centres |
Initiate response |
|
Vehicle probes |
Safety service patrol (if used) |
Detect incidents, SSP respond and assist |
|
Signal operation |
Adaptive signal controllers |
Regulate traffic flow around incident |
Improve throughput |
Traveller information |
Encourage diversions and journey time changes |
Operational Function |
Operational Method |
Resources Used |
Desired Result |
Traffic control/ influence |
Traveller information |
Safe, free flow past maintenance and other road work or diversion of route |
Resource |
Technology |
Further information |
511 (USA) |
Telephone travel information system |
|
Closed-circuit Television |
||
eCall |
Automated vehicle collision reporting system |
|
Electronic detectors |
Vehicle and pedestrian sensors |
|
Highway Advisory Radio |
||
Lane signals |
Overhead VMS showing lane availability |
|
Media feed |
Automatic feed of information to websites, radio and TV stations |
|
PDMS |
Portable Dynamic Message Sign |
|
Queue detectors |
Electronic sensors to detect queues / queue length |
|
Ramp signals |
Traffic signals to control traffic volumes entering a motorway / freeway |
|
RWMS |
Road Weather Management Systems |
|
Social media |
Facebook, Twitter, etc |
|
Speed advisory VMS |
Advisory Variable Message Signs |
|
Speed limit VMS |
Mandatory Variable Message Signs |
|
Video “tours” |
Successive display of CCTV images from different cameras |
|
Video wall |
Wall-mounted screens to display CCTV images |
|
Variable Message Signs |
The tables below summarise the typical activities that a Traffic Control Centre will perform for different types of traffic conditions on motorways, freeways, expressways and other regional arterial roads. The desired results (operational outcomes) are indicative of the specific situations. (See also TCC Functions)
Not all of the resources mentioned below will be present in every control centre. Field network telecommunications, device controller infrastructure and control room systems and software, are common to all and are not mentioned in the tables.
Operational Function |
Operational Method |
Resources Used |
Desired Result |
Traffic Monitoring and Surveillance |
Visual monitoring |
CCTV, video wall, workstations, video “tours” |
Maximum visual coverage of network |
Sensor monitoring |
Electronic vehicle detectors |
Maximum sensor coverage of network to capture traffic characteristics |
|
Vehicle probes |
Mobile safety patrols, crowd sourcing, floating vehicles |
Detect and verify incidents in timely fashion |
|
Traffic control/ influence |
Travel & Traffic information |
Inform public and logistics managers of conditions for self-decisions |
Operational Function |
Operational Method |
Resources Used |
Desired Result |
Traffic control/ influence |
Ramp metering |
Ramp signals, queue detectors |
Smooth merging, effect minor diversion |
Contra-flow, High Occupancy Toll, shoulder running or other special lane use |
Lane signals, VMS, PDMS |
Increase roadway capacity |
|
Variable speed limits |
Speed limit VMS |
Stabilise flow |
Operational Function |
Operational Method |
Resources Used |
Desired Result |
Surveillance |
Sensor monitoring |
Road Weather Management Systems |
Detect adverse weather |
Visual monitoring |
CCTV, video wall, workstations, video “tours” |
Detect and verify adverse weather |
Operational Function |
Operational Method |
Resources Used |
Desired Result |
Surveillance |
Road-user reports |
Cell-phones, emergency telephones, social media |
Operators alert to possible incident |
Visual monitoring |
CCTV, video wall, workstations, video “tours” |
Detect and verify incident, dispatch response, notify other responders |
|
Sensor monitoring |
Electronic detectors |
Incident detection algorithms: automatic alert for potential incident |
|
Incident notification |
Police, Emergency Control Centres |
Initiate response from rescue and ambulance services, vehicle recovery, emergency repair operators |
|
Patrol vehicles |
Safety service patrol, road watchers |
Detect incidents, Mobile patrols respond and assist |
|
Traffic control/ influence |
Travel & Traffic information |
VMS and signals, PDMS, HAR, 511, website, media feed, social media |
Encourage diversions and journey time changes |
Ramp metering |
Ramp signals, queue detectors |
Smooth merging, effect increased diversion |
|
Speed advisory |
Speed advisory VMS |
Calming of speeds and reduced lane changing |
|
Variable speed limits |
Speed limit VMS |
Reduce limit to safe speed |
|
Lane use control |
Lane signals |
Open/close lanes as appropriate |
|
Maintenance of traffic |
VMS, PDMS |
Safe, free flow past maintenance and other road work |
|
Queue warning |
VMS, PDMS |
Reduced secondary incidents; Safe, free flow past maintenance, other road works and incidents |
Operational Function |
Operational Method |
Resources Used |
Desired Result |
Traffic control/ influence |
Traveller information |
VMS, PDMS, HAR, eCall (511), website, media feed, social media |
Safe, free flow past maintenance and other road work or diversion of route |
Resource |
Technology |
Further information |
511[USA] |
Telephone travel information system |
|
Closed-circuit Television |
||
eCall |
Automated vehicle collision reporting system (Europe) |
|
Electronic detectors |
Vehicle and pedestrian sensors |
|
Highway Advisory Radio |
||
Lane signals |
Overhead VMS showing lane availability |
|
Media feed |
Automatic feed of information to websites, radio and TV stations & via social media |
|
PDMS |
Portable Dynamic Message Sign |
|
Queue detectors |
Electronic sensors to detect queues / queue length |
|
Ramp signals |
Traffic signals to control traffic volumes entering a motorway / freeway |
|
RWMS |
Road Weather Management Systems |
|
Social media |
Facebook, Twitter, etc |
|
Speed advisory VMS |
Advisory Variable Message Signs |
|
Speed limit VMS |
Mandatory Variable Message Signs |
|
Video “tours” |
Successive display of CCTV images from different cameras |
|
Video wall |
Wall-mounted screens to display CCTV images |
|
Variable Message Signs |
Successful Traffic Control Centre operations require effective administration. A basic requirement is easily accessible and well-organised reference documentation for control centre staff. A set of policies, plans, guides and instructions is needed to guide TCC managers and operators in their duties and collaboration with others (operating partners and other stakeholders).
A minimum set of documents, available in hard copy and/or on-line electronically, will be:
The establishment of a business plan is recommended to provide a roadmap for agencies to establish the TCC goals and objectives and to achieve them. A properly implemented TCC business plan will provide justification for sustained operations by means of on-going performance measurement and reporting of outcomes. The business plan also helps to identify the present and desired future state of the TCC’s operational effectiveness and key gaps that need to be addressed. The plan will include:
TCCs require significant and committed funding for their deployment, operation and maintenance. A lack of continuing funding will affect and limit the desired results. Adequate staffing and operations planning are also necessary. The majority of transport agencies run TCCs with public-sector staff but some outsource the TCC operations to private-sector companies – sometimes because it has been a challenge to staff and train personnel to effectively operate the TCC.
Key to successful road network operations is the inter-agency, multidisciplinary integration of the TCC with the operational activities of other organisations that have a part to play or who manage adjacent highway networks. This is referred to by some as the “4-Cs": Communication, Cooperation, Coordination, Consensus.
Managing routine traffic, traffic incidents and even transport emergencies is greatly enhanced by organisations collectively applying the 4-Cs. This is best done when centres like the TCC, Emergency Control Centre (ECC) and/or Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) are co-located – or at least have close two-way communication for data and information exchange and sharing of CCTV camera images. For example, information seen on camera can be actively provided to those responding to a traffic incident (police, fire, other emergency services, towing companies and maintenance) so responders can request the resources they need.
The vast majority of ITS technology is deployed in urban areas and alongside motorways, although some ITS devices are deployed in remote rural areas. Given the distances involved, this poses an economic challenge to the responsible organisation. Wireless communications overcome some of the challenges – but full coverage for surveillance and traveller information is still difficult. The increasing use of Floating (or Probe) Vehicle Data (FVD) provides TCCs with the ability to access data that can indicate rural incidents and trigger both response and information dissemination to travellers and responders. (See Probe Vehicle Monitoring)
ITS asset management includes not just hardware, but also software and key personnel, in order to support the long-term goals of the organisation and maintain its ITS capability. General guidelines include:
For information on Traffic Control Centre staffing See http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freewaymgmt/publications/frwy_mgmt_handbook/chapter14_04.htm
It is essential that managers provide comprehensive training in every aspect of traffic management and related topics to the staff who have a role in TCC operations.
Training comes in many forms, among them:
Field exercises are generally more appropriate for those who respond to incidents on the road or highway. In-house exercises can be designed for TCC operators – the challenge is the ability to simulate actual operations and procedures including the use of equipment and devices. Some centres have demonstration equipment that can be used for this purpose.
One-on-one training and small group on-job training is most likely to be recalled by those who experience it but it takes time to encounter a wide variety of situations. The more interactive the training can be, the more effective it will be in producing lasting success.
A useful report on “Impacts of Technology Enhancements on Transport Management Centre Operations,” produced by the Transport Management Centre Pooled Fund Study (TMC PFS) in the USA, provides guidance to TMC/TCC managers on how to better position themselves operationally in anticipation of future technology changes and advancements. (See http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop13008/index.htm)
Effective Road Network Operations (RNO) require that the network monitoring and traffic control systems are fully functional. This is accomplished most effectively by monitoring the system components. There are two aspects to this:
Traffic Control Centre (TCC) software will monitor the incoming data, images and other media from the field devices that are used for routine traffic management and incident detection, verification, notification and dispatch.
Within the TCC, the software automatically monitors the status of its key processors, servers, video displays, communications and all the other assorted equipment – and the software itself – to ensure a high level of operational efficiency. Equally important, these form the core of data and information used for performance management. (See Planning Procedures)
Monitoring system performance is essential in evaluating its success in achieving its objectives. Typically, the TCC software will have modules that automatically monitor the various components to detect and report failures or other anomalies that need to be brought to the operators’ attention. Depending on the device type, in legacy systems this is generally achieved through: periodic polling of the devices to sense expected responses, monitoring of data streams for continuity – and other diagnostic techniques.
As device sophistication improves the trend is to incorporate more self-diagnostics, pushing data on equipment status and performance to the central system. The results of the monitoring are used for instant failure reporting, as well as providing system performance measures over time.
From a traffic operations perspective, system monitoring and automatic fault reporting is essential. It enables the TCC operators and managers, along with the maintenance team, to keep the system healthy to perform its tasks in managing traffic and providing situational awareness to the travelling public. System monitoring helps to ensure that managers can be confident that the investment in ITS is being nurtured and protected through proper operation, or that problems are identified and can be addressed promptly.
In the USA, Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise operates a unique tolling and revenue monitoring system. The SunWatch Centre monitors all equipment in the system, alerts operators to malfunctions and failures, and takes action to mitigate the problem.
Given the nature of its operations, the SunWatch Centre is not widely advertised, but some information is available from the International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association’s website at http://ibtta.org/awards/sunwatch-operations-center
ITS asset management includes not just hardware, but also software and key personnel, in order to support the long-term goals of the organisation and maintain its ITS capability.
Maintenance activities on ITS devices and traffic signal systems can impact on Road Network Operations. When ITS is first deployed, the equipment is new and does not require extensive maintenance resources. As systems expand and age, there is a continuing need for – and complexity of – maintenance operations.Two aspects of maintenance have a direct impact on operations:
There are two types of routine maintenance: preventive and responsive.
Preventive Maintenance is generally regularly scheduled maintenance designed to pre-empt device failure that would render the device unserviceable. Preventive maintenance will extend the active life of devices and subsystems. It can use past experience to anticipate when devices should receive attention. Automated maintenance management systems base the scheduling on a number of factors that are analysed by the software to produce a schedule.
Preventive maintenance can be as simple as cleaning cabinets and cable runs/conduits, securing wiring and printed circuit board connections, to scheduled pre-emptive repair. Alternatively it can entail replacement of components or entire devices.
Responsive maintenance (or reactive maintenance) concerns the repair or replacement of a component or system following failure or damage caused by a collision or other incident. Failed ITS equipment and non-functioning network monitoring devices will not provide the images, data or information needed to help maintain stable traffic flow.
When failures occur the devices cannot perform their functions, which will often be detrimental to RNO. Responsive maintenance should be the highest priority, since restoring equipment function is the key objective. It is advisable for TCC operators to prioritise conflicting maintenance needs, rather than leaving maintenance staff to determine this themselves.
The key to successful maintenance is to have a complete, manageable inventory of all devices. Automated support software can be an ideal way to maintain the inventory – and can also assist in preventive and responsive maintenance operations. (See Data Management and Archiving)
Florida Department of Transportation provides an example of a combined ITS Maintenance Management Systems (MMS) and Fibre Management Systems (FMS), known as the ITS Facility Management System (ITSFM). (See http://www.dot.state.fl.us/trafficoperations/ITS/Projects_Telecom/ITSFM/ITSFM.shtm)
Factors that lead to the adoption of an automated maintenance system include:
Most Traffic Control Centres (TCCs) have “up-time” targets for system availability that challenge the maintenance team to keep devices operational at least a certain percentage of time, for example, 98% or 99% availability. Only automated systems can both organise the maintenance activities and keep track of them. An ITS maintenance management system and a communications management system are part of the ITS operation, just like the TCC software. If the RNO organisation operates its own comprehensive telecommunications networks, this will justify a telecommunications “network manager”, which is common place in the telecommunications sector.
Systems maintenance can be performed either by in-house staff or outsourced to others—usually original equipment suppliers but also third party maintenance companies. In some regions the trend is towards outsourcing systems maintenance to private contractors. The substantial differences in the nature of ITS and roadway maintenance, generally leads to ITS maintenance being outsourced to a specialised electrical contractor.
Some large consulting firms are increasingly expanding their involvement in this business, sometimes called asset management.
The purpose here is to maintain ITS equipment or restore it to a condition that can effectively handle the assigned functions, at the lowest possible cost. To achieve this objective, the operator must:
Organisational arrangements will depend on the size of the maintenance operation, the volume, nature and location of equipment, and the resources and skills available. Organisations will need to determine the scope of maintenance activities to be undertaken internally by the operating organisation and those that will be sub-contracted.
Effective maintenance is based primarily on detailed wording of supply contracts, follow-up and effective handover. This is to ensure a precise definition of the work to be performed, conditions of delivery, contract deadlines for restoring service and penalties for non-compliance. It also relies on:
Motorway Maintenance Management Systems (MMMS) generally operate on limited-access roadways, which carry high volumes of traffic at relatively high speeds. Disruption to traffic adversely impacts traffic operations. Fortunately, many ITS devices are located off the roadway, but within the s of way, so maintenance activities can be conducted without directly interfering with traffic. Even in these cases temporary traffic control devices may be required for the protection of the maintenance crew. Efficiency of maintenance operations is essential.
The mere presence of maintenance vehicles causes driver distraction (“rubbernecking”), in the same way as roadside incidents. This is a particular concern in restricted situations, for example part of a tunnel or long bridge. Working on, or adjacent to, live carriageways is hazardous and some simple precautions are needed – for example, high visibility clothing, hazard lights and deployment of temporary traffic management to close lanes.
There is greater traffic disruption when the maintenance crew must work over an active lane or median shoulder, such as on the exterior of a VMS. When this happens, the crew is generally required to close the lane(s) over which they work and deploy temporary measures to maintain traffic flow. This work should, whenever possible, be done during off peak times to minimise the adverse effect on traffic. The work is often contracted out to specialist firms to provide temporary traffic management. The TCC will need to be vigilant in ensuring that measures to maintain traffic flow are in place and are operating effectively at all times.
These considerations apply equally to maintenance of routine traffic control and information devices, such as fixed signage – so general maintenance should follow the same practices as the ITS maintenance agency. The TCC should be notified whenever there are activities on the motorway, particularly if lanes are to be closed. Some countries use Lane Closure Management Systems to schedule and manage closure requests and contractor roadwork.
Particularly dangerous work sites – for example on one of the traffic lanes – should be protected by a crash barrier (crash-attenuator or crash cushion) such as a vehicle or trailer positioned upstream of the lane closure. In Santiago, Chile, one of the urban toll road operators requires all providers of maintenance to equip work crews with such equipment.
The primary difference between motorway and urban arterial road networks is that in the urban situation considerably more maintenance has to be done on, or immediately above, the roadway itself. Traffic signal heads, supporting span arms, signs, wires and overhead vehicle detectors are all located over the roadway. Devices off the roadway, such as signal cabinets and other ITS equipment, will also generally be located in less open spaces. If a hard shoulder is not available it is likely they must be accessed from a traffic lane. Lane closures are far more likely on urban arterials roads and city streets.
Many high-capacity urban arterial roads experience traffic speeds that are not significantly slower than a motorway. Other roads have lower traffic volumes, particularly off peak, and traffic speeds may be lower too. Temporary traffic management is important and without it, conditions may be unsafe. The number of movements possible (such as driveways and turning movements) also greatly increase hazards. The paramount objective must be the safety of the maintenance crew.